Showing posts with label 08Alternatives. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 08Alternatives. Show all posts

Friday, October 23, 2015

Alternatives by Morita

Agriculture cooperative:


Connections and actors:


Entrances:


Streets as places:


Resiliant community:

Intervention throgh NGO T.E.P.E.:

NGO T.E.P.E.: the only non-profit organization that take care of the children in La Otra Banda. The children can visit and stay at the organization for free. Their goal is to increase the quality of life for children who come from poorer families in the neighborhood. The center is open in the morning hours because it wants to aim children who go to school in the afternoon (usually a sign of lower class).
Families (people of La Otra Banda): from the statistic gather in La Otra Banda, we can tell, that women are in slight majority in this city quarter. In the living room of La Otra Banda the proportions between male and females are almost equal, however women tend to be in slight majority.
The children are huge group of the inhabitants in La Otra Banda. The citizens in age from 0 to 17 constitute over 65 percent of all inhabitants in this city quarters. People in productive age (from 18 till 64) constitute only around 20 percent while elderly around 15 percent. From those statistic we can tell that children with their families (and most important mothers) are very important stakeholders in the region.
From the statistic we also find out that most of the people in La Otra Banda (around 60 percent) is working and another 5 percent are actively looking for a job. Big percent of the inhabitants in La Otra Banda in the statistics is marked as occupationally inactive (around 35 percent). To this group can belong the elderly who reached their retainment age and most probably women – mothers, who decided to become stay home mothers and take care of their children or have unregistered occupation, e.g. selling newspapers, cleaning cars, etc. 

The NGO T.E.P.E. is to our knowledge the only private actor who deals with social family issues in La Otra Banda. It would be important to build on the work the T.E.P.E. has already done and is still doing and support the NGO in their further work and help them find ideas for new approaches and financing of their projects.
Right now that T.E.P.E. finances its project with the money from different foundations, for which they need to apply. In order to receive the money the NGO must fulfill certain criteria required by particular foundation. The project must consider specific social issue what limits the T.E.P.E. in their work. The NGO would like to be more independent, receive independent foundating to carry out project they hold as important and not necessary the ones which fit into criteria of the foundations.
The first step in the approach would be to find alternative financing sources for T.E.P.E. One of them could be fundraising by private persons. It is important to remember that foundrising is approach that don't bring the profits straight away but needs time to develop. That is way it would be important for T.E.P.E. in the beginning of the process not to relay completely on this form of financing, but to still apply for founds. In the first year only small project could be finance with money received from the donors. The complete fundrising strategy can be develop after approving of this approach in the Morita team.
Using the money from fundrising, T.E.P.E. could introduce some new projects that would lead to strengthening of the families (e.g. through reducing or eliminating domestic violence) and empowerment of women in La Otra Banda. Examples of possible new projects:
1) domestic violence prevention
2) sexual education at schools for female students (protected sex, providing condoms for female students, what are other methods of anti-conception, how can the girls have access to it)
3) sexual education/consultation in schools or outside of it. It lead to higher age when the women get pregnant and through that increase their education (women stay at school).
4) free medical care (e.g. once a month) in relation to sexual health 
Women are the homemakers. If the house is to be strong and resilient, the women need to be strong and empowered. The women who are involve with T.E.P.E. could organize one of the festivals in La Otra Banda (women and children festival?).
During the festival T.E.P.E. could display their different projects, which on the one hand could work as advertisement and on the other spread awareness of different social issues in the neighborhood. The festival could also be used to collect donation for further work of the NGO.






Thursday, October 22, 2015

ALTERNATIVES

Challenge 08  - Metaphores (ideate) / What if / Qualities and Personas 


Based on the precise challenge definition, explore the problem through metaphor, analogy and iteration of ideas, create a catalogue of project solution variants.
Identifiy the qualities, assets, strengths and weaknesses of each variant.
Create a set of personas, fictional caracters representing the different interest groups and stakeholder involved in the sucess of the project.

Suggested tools / methods:
  • "Aim for the stars and land on the moon" 
    think out of the box, think big, beyond what is realistic. Exercise your common brain-power to its full potential to come up with innovative solutions. Even if one of the solutions might be a failure, the success lies within knowing one direction not to go.
    Keep Samual Beckett's quote in mind: try again, fail again, fail better.
  • Criterias: Why do you like it?
  • Metaphor: If the preject was a... it would be a... 
  • Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats: SWOT analysis
  • User and Stakeholder: Persona profiling


Wednesday, September 9, 2015

Phase C / Virtual Collaboration

Work in Progress | CW 42 2015 – CW 3 2016 
Back at Home University | Virtual Collaboration

The goal of the third phase is to develop the design, to formulate expertise, to create innovative solutions – and to get physical. After the introductory days in Mexico, the students return to their home universities. At the same time, they form local teams at the different locations to exchange basic information useful for all project teams. All basic data and project documentations are managed over the elop* information platform (dropbox).

Structure of the semester
In the virtual phase C each team will go through three iteration phases. Each of this phases will be structured through definition of weekly challenges. A set of tools and methods to answer those challenges will be introduced by the coaching team.

Logbook on the blog https//:elop8.blogspot.ch
All teams will feed and exchange information through a blog. This is to be understood as a logbook and an exchange platform during the whole process of the project and will show the development of the project. The teams upload weekly their main work-in-progresses and answer to the challenges introduced each week. 
This will allow the team coaches to follow the teams’ process and to comment on the project development.

Regular Coaching Sessions
The teams will present the stage of their work on two intermediate reviews by using video-conferencing systems. Between the reviews, the teams organize weekly team meetings and coaching sessions together with the team coaches and in each student will share the project development in the local disciplinary group with the local coach. 

Inputs
During the semester/term punctual virtual inputs may be organized on specific topics.

Review I


Goal
All teams present the results and the state of the project in relation to the defined goals with a perspective on the final output formulated during the Physical Kick Off and a rational of decision taking.

Present the project by sharing the process based on the weekly challenges (deconstruction, prioritisation, ideation, qualities, personas). Show different scenarios (variants) of your interventions and the critical understanding of each scenarios‘ qualities.

Organization | Two sessions by video conference | Oct. 28th & 29th 2015
Presentation 10 minutes per team, questions and feedback 30 minutes.

Hand In | October 26th 2015 midnight CET
A copy of each team‘s presentation is to be saved on Dropbox (Attention to changing time: CEST > CET : -1h ).

Deliverables
PPT presentation (max. 15 slides) - all necessary elements to explain the scenarios and their qualities. (story boards, plans, collages, infographies, pictures, organigrams, mind maps, mood boards etc.)
Working model (digital/physical)
Visualization of process planning, next planned meetings and milestones, required special need of support by experts etc.

Post review Challenge:
Team process: I wish I like exercise to process feedback from review, reset
project priorities and criteria, refresh dynamics and understand the way forward.


Review I


Goal
All teams present the results and the state of the project in relation to the defined goals with a perspective on the final output based on review I and a rational of decision taking and team process statement. 

Present project by sharing the process based on the weekly challenges
(reality check, paracosmos and decision making criteria). A single strong concept is presented in its full richness and multidimensionality, including the identified weaknesses to be improved in the next stage of the project.

Organization | Two sessions by video conference | Dec. 2nd and 3rd 2015
Presentation 10 minutes per team, questions and feedback 30 minutes.

Hand in | November 30th 2015 midnight (CET)
A copy of each team‘s presentation is to be saved on the Dropbox.

Deliverables
PPT presentation (max. 15 slides) - all necessary elements to explain the concept and ith strength (story boards, plans, collages, infographies, pictures, organigrams, mind maps, mood boards etc.)
Working model (digital/physical)
Visualization of process planning, next planned meetings and milestones, required special need of support by experts etc.

During Review II the teams have to provide a perspective on the planned steps to achieve the final result. Each team will get guidance to follow towards the final results in the Final Review.