Showing posts with label Cabinet of Curiosities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cabinet of Curiosities. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 16, 2015

5.4 Abandoned Buildings

Abandoned Buildings
It is estimated that there are about 200 abandoned buildings in downtown Querétearo. About 60 of them are found around in the Tepetate area and La Otra Banda. Most of the buildings in the Historical Center are protected by the National Institute of Anthropology, while others are in a decaying state.

Many abandoned buildings are small properties that are becoming a problem in their neighborhoods. Some of these places end up with broken windows, graffiti or invaded by intruders.

Many buildings could be restored and reused or retrofitted for different purposes. Since there is a lack of public spaces, some scholars have suggested the creation of small community areas for social interaction. Other people have suggested the creation of affordable housing since most people have to find inexpensive home in the suburbs; far from schools and job opportunities.

Unless designers, government officials, scholars or neighbors decide to create sporting areas, public spaces, community gardens or collective housing, most likely the abandoned buildings will continue to decay and create a more depressed neighborhood.

Abandoned Buildings


Further Reading (Issuu)


5.3 Old Train Station

Old Train Station

The Old train station was built in 1904. Today the railroad system is only used to transport cargo. Nowadays the station functions as a small cultural center, along with some warehouses nearby. Most of the daily users are elderly citizens who live nearby and participate in chess competitions, salsa lessons and arts and crafts workshops. 

The building hosts an improvised theater, has a large multipurpose room and a small museum dedicated to the history of the train. At times the building has been used for community gatherings. The ministry of Culture operates this historical facility.

The site where the station is located is about 7,650m2. Right next to station is the Headquarters of Kansas City Southern Rail Network in Mexico who was granted the privileged of using the track for the transportation of cargo.


Many Central American immigrants use the train to travel to the United States. Many of the travelers rest in the area before continuing their journey. 

Further Reading (Issuu)


5.2 El Tepetate Market

El Tepetate Market


Originally built in 1978, today's Tepetate Market is not big enough. Three times per week, many vendors take over the neighboring streets in order to sell their goods. This “tianguis” (market stalls) cause noise, disorder and sometimes theft among visitors and street vendors. The city has debated whether to remodel the old building in order to expand and to improve its energy consumption and urban condition.

Because of constant growth, the building has suffered improvised renovations. Its surface is approximately 4,700m2 and sits on 14,400m2 block that includes parking, offices and storage.

Since the Market has taken on the adjacent streets, there are no public spaces nearby. The main plaza is used at times, as a gathering area or for football purposes. During the tianguis, street vendors cover the area and provide provisional shade for their goods.

The street vendors and the market merchants do not get along and belong to different Unions. The people who sell goods on the street typically have to pay a fee to the Union leaders who provide security and a spot on the street. Even though the tianguis may seem as a chaotic event, there are many rules that they need to follow. However, some of the obvious problems are that street vendors do not pay taxes, do not have restrooms, running water or garbage disposals causing health hazards in the community.

Further reading (Issuu)



5.1 Alcanfores Park




Alcanfores is the only large park in the area. It was built in the late 1980s as a response to the social housing projects that needed green spaces.

The park's access is limited to the public because its surroundings are fenced. Very few people visit the site; mainly young parents with small children and elderly citizens who exercise in the mornings.

This area was originally agricultural productive land. Ironically, the majority of the vegetation today is not native plants. 

Alcanfores Park
The actual park is made up two areas divided by the train tracks. The large portion in the North measures about 80,000m2 and the South park 27,000m2. A long time ago, there was a bridge that united the two areas. Now, these two have no connecting points. A road crosses through both parks linking the downtown area with several traditional neighborhoods to the North.

Further Reading (Issuu):



North Park / Alcanfores

Wednesday, September 9, 2015

References

Bibliography and Links (Selection)


Querétaro (State Government)

City of Querétaro (Municipal Government)
http://www.municipiodequeretaro.gob.mx/

IMPLAN Querétaro (Municipal Institute of Planning)

INEGI Queretaro (Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico)

CONAVI (National Housing Commission)

CONAPO (National Population Commission)

Parque Alcanfores

Old Train Station

Tepetate Market



Arvizu, G. Carlos. Evolución Urbana de Querétaro, 1531-2005. Tecnológico de Monterrey, Querétaro. 2005.

Arvizu, G. Carlos. Querétaro Aspectos de su Historia. Tecnológico de Monterrey. Queretaro 1984.

Armas Briz Luz, Oliva Solis, and Guadalupe Zarate. Historia y Monumentos del Estado de Querétaro. Gobierno del Estado de Querétaro. 2011

García Ugarte, Marta Eugenia. Querétaro. Historia Breve. El Colegio de Mexico. 2010.

Frías, Valenti. Las calles de Queretaro. Municipio de Querétaro. 2012.

Landa Fonseca Cecilia. Queretaro. Gobierno del Estado de Querétaro. Instituto de Investigaciones. México Df. 1990.

Kunz Bolaños Ignacio. Mercado del Suelo en la Zona Conurbada de Queretaro. Poder Ejecutivo del Estado de Querétaro. 2011.

Plan Parcial de Desarrollo Urbano de la Zona de Monumentos y Barrios Tradicionales  de la Ciudad de Santiago de Querétaro. Secretaría de Desarrollo Urbano de Obras Públicas. Querétaro. 2013.2005.

Programa Estatal de Vivienda. PEVI. Secretaría de Desarrollo Urbano de Obras Públicas. Querétaro. 2013.

Septien Manuel y Herresa Ignacio. Cartografía de Querétaro. Colección de 35 planos de la Ciudad Capital y Estado. 2da Edición. 1978

Full articles available on dropbox

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

4.4 Social Cohesion


Train Tracks Near the Old Train Station

Mexico is a country of many contrasts. Its population is highly polarized politically, economically and educationally. The different social classes quite often do not interact with each other: do not go to the same schools, do not buy in the same markets, do not use the same public space, do not use the same transportation system, or attend the same hospitals.

Due to the large amount of migrants seeking better opportunities and safety, most of the people who arrive to Queretaro do not know the history of the city. Their integration into the city is more an economical than a social one. Therefore, many of the newcomers are not familiar with traditional barrios like the Tepetate neighborhood.

In addition to this lack of integration, undocumented immigrants from Central American arrive by train and are outcast by the locals. There is also a social conflict between some residents and the merchants who occupy street and accumulate waste on sidewalks.

Area around old train station
Further Reading (Articles available on dropbox)





Further Reading (Issuu)


4.3 Local Economy

Informal Commerce

Despite relatively high levels of marginalization, Queretaro still enjoys a privileged economy compared to the rest of the country. According to the "Urban Competitiveness Index", Queretaro in 2012 placed the fourth most competitive economy in Mexico.

The industrial boom attracted many middle class professionals who migrated from neighboring states. Today, Queretaro has become a city made up of foreigners.

The Tepetate area suffers from a stagnant economy and many families tend to rely on informal commerce as an additional income. This has caused informality in business and improvisation in the occupation of urban space. For this reason there are few public spaces, as people prefer to sell products here rather than use them as recreational spaces. 

The people in fringe conditions have little recreational time. Furthermore, most street markets do not pay taxes to avoid reductions in their earnings. Since street markets have existed in Mexico since pre-colonial times, these tiaguis are a sign of the lack of affordable and nearby commerce and have become part of the culture and national identity.
Tianguis
Social Housing and Tianguis




Further Reading (Articles available on dropbox)




Further Reading(Issuu)

4.2 Urban Renovation

Area After Tianguis

Mexico is a country with stark social and economic delays. Therefore, the priorities in urban terms are as basic as providing water, electricity, drainage and sidewalks for people. For this reason, the government primarily reacts to resolve pressing problems and has little time, energy and resources to generate future strategic visions.

According to the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI), Queretaro has 20,000 new residents each year. This migration phenomenon coupled with poor planning, has caused an uncontrolled urban growth sometimes affecting the economic development of communities.


It is also a fact that the UNESCO protected Center has been a priority, making it difficult to address other areas of the city with the same degree of efficiency.

In 2007 the City of Queretaro approved new plans for urban development. However, these plans do not envision a holistic strategy by not considering mobility and public transport. As part of an urban renewal strategy it has been detected the lack of marketplaces, health centers, sport areas, parks and recreation areas, among other collective infrastructure.


Since the municipality intends to connect and renew the city in order to improve the quality of life by providing fairer opportunities, the authorities have proposed to:

• Improve urban connectivity
• Create new parks
• Increase and rehabilitate existing green and recreational spaces.
• Improve the city's image.

Further Reading (Articles available on dropbox)
Community-Based Advocacy at the Intersection of Public Health and Transportation: The Challenges of Addressing Local Health Impacts within a Regional Policy Process
Latin American Meander- In Search of a New Civic Imagination
United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development
Future of Places - Sustainable Development Goal



4.1 Collective Housing


Collective Housing and Tianguis

In recent decades, social housing in Mexico has been developed by private enterprises whose primary goal is economic profit. Many of these housing developments are far from city centers because land costs are inexpensive. This has caused many problems of mobility, social segregation, isolation, traffic congestion and pollution, and also lack of equipment, infrastructure or mixed programs.

People who cannot afford new social housing or do not want to live far from the city tend to invade land or other people's properties. These squatters build their own houses illegally occupying protected natural areas or land that is vulnerable to floods or landslides. 


Housing

In the area of Tepetate and the former Train station, most of the buildings were self-constructed and grew progressively. This is one of the reasons the urban layout is irregular and the building blocks have different shapes and sizes.

Municipal governments have worked towards the creation of housing programs that prioritize the most vulnerable people. The intention is to make affordable housing in good urban locations. This new proposals intend to develop projects that contemplate a public funding.


65 % of houses in Mexico are self built
Further Reading (Issuu)

Monday, September 7, 2015

4. Vectors of Development

The vectors of development were chosen according to current academic debates, social demands and strategies developed by both State and Municipal governments.Although local authorities have proposed relevant plans, little progress has been made. That is why the 4 vectors  (Collective Housing, Urban renovation, Local Economy and Social Cohesion) encompass some of the following strategies developed by the latest “State Plan of Queretaro 2010 – 2015”: 

  • Communal development strategies 
  • Security and law enforcement 
  • Strengthening the economy 
  • Social and human development 
  • Land management, employment 
  • Health 
  • Housing and infrastructure 
  • Management and growth

3. Task Definition

Area Around Old Train Station

Task Definition.
Elop*8 has chosen the Area of the Tepetate Neighborhood and La Otra Banda Neighborhood in Querétaro, México as site for the project because of the unique and complex conditions it offers for a trans-disciplinary project. The area has an opportunity to overcome its current deprived state and become a rejuvenated neighborhood.

Contrary to the Historic Center, citizens and government officials have paid little attention to the area, making it difficult to receive funding for urban renovation. These fringe conditions have made the Tepetate area a depressed place.

Today's problems are a consequence of the site's history: deprived economy, lack of public spaces, urban abandonment, irregular and informal settlements and a lack of affordable housing.
Areas of Study

Approach
The potential to renovate the area socially, economically and spatially is remarkable and ambitious. Historically in Mexico, large master plans do not work. Local governments do not have enough time or money to develop complex actions. It is suggested that all proposals should be feasible, realistic and holistic. In recent times, some community projects have been successful because of their “bottom-up” strategy. Rather than creating ambitious plans by the government that have not been approved by society, some communities have gathered to work together for collective benefit.

Risks
There have been plans to invest in its urban renewal. However, there is a risk of altering the social and economic structure and the neighborhood's identity that could lead to “gentrification”. This long due revitalization could improve its public safety, the local economy and its urban image, but could provoke the displacement of local inhabitants because of the possible increase in property prices.

Students should be aware that depending solely on the inclusion of Financial Investors in their proposals, could lead to negative effects. However, if students decide not to include any developers, it would be difficult to create profound changes in the community. It is suggested to consider different and alternative solutions for the positive transformation of the social and urban renewal of the neighborhood: creation of “co-ops”, external funding, “bottom-up” strategies, some Real State developer’s presence, governmental support, etc.


Key questions
This project aims to respond to a variety of questions and to elaborate a holistic proposal that empowers its inhabitants and transform the deprived area into a safe, vibrant, beautiful, resilient and equitable neighborhood. As part of the holistic strategy it is important to consider:
How to initiate change in the area?
How can the inhabitants be integrated in the transformation of the neighborhood?
How can the team's proposals empower the community equally? 
How can small actions trigger big changes in the community?

Therefore, students face interesting dilemmas for this ELOP challenge. 
What would happen if no investment or urban renovation occurs in this area? 
Is local investment possible without gentrification? 
Who could invest in the area: the community or Real Estate developers? 
Can the community work together to improve the existing conditions of its neighborhood?
Can developers consider social and environmental benefits and not just financial returns?

Old Train Station

Starting point.
The area of study is large in scale. About 12'000 inhabitants live there. This site is made up several “colonias”, barrios or neighborhoods. It is important to primarily focus on the Southern area, which includes the old Train Station, The Alcanfores Park and the Tepetate Market and its relationship to the UNESCO site and other surroundings. 

It is up to each team to explore the connections among each site or to fully develop a solution for a specific problem. Since this is a large and complex area, it is not expected that each team works on all areas or to fully develop proposals for all locations. Actually, it is recommended that the different teams understand and complement each other's proposals. The sum of all ideas could become a strategic repertoire of urban, social and environmental solutions.

Goals
The ultimate goal is to provoke a positive change in the community by creating proposals that are holistic, inclusive, feasible and realistic. These proposals do not need to be large in scale, but rather small actions that can trigger big changes over time. It is recommended that the proposals include the involvement and empowerment of local inhabitants to produce locally rooted actions and the mitigation of negative aspects of gentrification.

The vision
Since Mexico is vulnerable to drastic changes due to political and economical uncertainty, it is difficult to accomplish long-term proposals. Therefore, it is very important to reflect how small inexpensive actions could eventually improve and dignify the quality of life of the local inhabitants. Due to the lack of resources and law regulations, it is common to build in Mexico over time (in construction sequences or phases). For instance, a small public plaza could become a community garden and eventually a community center that includes the public space and green areas. Another example is the one-story houses, that evolve into larger homes (2 or 3 stories high) and eventually the bottom floor becomes a family-owned commercial facility. 





2. Context

Mexico / Queretaro

México

México is a nation with a vast cultural wealth and strong social contrasts and contradictions. The country is composed of a variety of ecosystems, climates, languages and traditions. México, is home to Carlos Slim, one of the richest men in the world, but also home to over 53 million poor people; representing 46.2% of the total population.

In Mexico, the contrasts among neighborhoods and across society are unsettling. Some neighborhoods may have similar rates of HDI (Human Development Index) of countries like France or Canada, while other Mexican villages may have the violence rates of Honduras, the educational levels of Syria, or the poverty level of Mauritania.

Queretaro 1770

Querétaro

During the Empire of Tenochtitlan (1325-1521), the State of Queretaro was part of the great Chichimeca, the land of the nomadic tribes that had not been defeated by the powerful Aztecs, Otomi or Tarascos located nearby.

Later on, cattle ranches, industrious people and religious missioners populated this area. The population increased after the discovery of silver mines in the city of Zacatecas 400 kilometers away from Querétaro.

The exchange of goods and constant flow of passengers also increased due to the Mexico-Zacatecas road, also know as  “Camino Real” and “Silver Route”. This also increased the importance of the villages situated at intermediate points; including Queretaro.
Queretaro, 210 kilometers north of Mexico City was one of the stops along the Colonial route. This is one reason why Querétaro once a small unimportant town during the sixteenth century, became a relevant city in the nineteenth century.

Due to its privileged geographical position, Queretaro became a strategic location. Soil fertility and the benign climate, gave Queretaro a reputation as one of the most beautiful and lavish places of the “New Spain”.

El Camino Real / Queretaro 1778

Querétaro Nowadays

Thanks to its strategic location and proximity to Mexico City, Queretaro became an industrial city hosting major international companies such as Bombardier, Santander Bank, Kellogs, Eurocopter, Procter and Gamble, etc. This industrial hub caused the acceleration of its urbanization and metropolitan growth since the 1980s. Queretaro has over 20 industrial parks that manufacture airplanes, helicopters, software and auto parts.

Because of this industrial booming, the state of Queretaro is placed third nationally in terms of demographic growth, as it recorded a population increase of 26% between 2000 and 2010. During the last decade, the state population grew from 423.831 inhabitants, to reach 1,827,937 people.

This growth is largely due to the arrival of new inhabitants searching for safer settings and job opportunities.



Urban Growth
El Tepetate and La Otra Banda (The Others)
In the late sixteenth century the Viceroy Luis de Velasco granted a license to manufacture cloths. Today this area is known as “El Tepe” or “La Otra Banda” (the others) and is located on the riverbank on the northern part of Queretaro.

In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries epidemics of cholera and leprosy sickened the population of the city and the indigenous inhabitants were the main victims. This area quickly became the poorest neighborhood in Queretaro.

El Tepetate neighborhood was the city limit and its name is given because of the porous and abundant stone found in that area. This area became an informal commerce location, as it was a meeting point for horsemen with goods to sell in Queretaro.

The first formal buildings in the Tepetate area were made of stone and adobe, but were smaller in scale compared to the structures in the City Centre. In the area existed mainly orchards and agricultural land.  A couple of watchtowers were built in the area as an entry point in the city.


During the dictatorship of Porfirio Diaz, the train station was built in this area (1904). This area became the entryway to Queretaro and soon after, these commercial services were found in this place. Along with commerce, canteens and prostitution proliferated.

Old Train Station & the Watch Tower

Further Reading (Issuu):





1. Introduction

"A cabinet of curiosities was an encyclopaedic collection of extraordinary objects which attempted to categorise the wonders and oddities of the natural world.”

The objective of our elop*8 cabinet of curiosities is to offer a rich knowledge data base and to collect information, images, texts, articles, research papers, testimonials, lectures and others related to the topic in a large sense.

Students are encouraged to read and discover the cabinet and to come up with their own interpretation of these documents. This offers the opportunity to all participants to immerse themselves in the Mexican culture, the context of Querétaro, the topics related to the four vectors of development and create a personal understanding of the task. The Cabinet of Curiosities is meant to be an evolving repertory of knowledge that will be constantly enriched by coaches and students throughout the semester. 

Its contents are structured following these categories: